Dispute Resolution

From boardroom battles to employment dispute, we represent clients in complex, high-stakes disputes—efficiently, strategically and relentlessly.

Our Dispute Resolution team represents clients in high-value civil litigation and regulatory matters. We act for corporates, statutory bodies, and high-net-worth individuals in disputes, shareholder rights, torts, employment and defamation.

Our approach is strategic and client-focused—balancing legal strength with practical outcomes to preserve business relationships and protect reputational and financial interests.

Capabilities

Represented and acted for 1740 plaintiffs in a civil class suit against a reputable bank in Malaysia involving the mass freezing and earmarking of savings and current accounts by a financial institution, including claims for general damages and defence against a RM257.9 million
counterclaim for money had and received, raising precedent-setting issues on banking institutions’ duties to customers. This action has a significant impact on the banking industry in relation to the management of the savings and/or current account maintained by their customers wherein the Court’s decision may be set as precedent for the duty of banking institutions to their customers. This case also will become the test case for the issue on money had and received as raised by the defendants and may be set as a local precedent in determining the principle of law related to the banking and financial institution. (Kuala Lumpur High Court Suit No. WA-22NCC-84-02/2022)
Represented and acted for 1740 plaintiffs in a judicial review against Bank Negara Malaysia. The application sought judicial determination of Bank Negara Malaysia’s decision to commence an investigation against a financial institution, following complaints concerning the management of the plaintiffs’ savings and current accounts. The judicial review application sought for the Court’s determination to decide on the decision made by Bank Negara Malaysia in relation to its power to commence investigation against financial institution. (Kuala Lumpur High Court Suit No. WA-25-42-04/2022)
Acted as instructing solicitors for the defendants in a claim before the Singapore High Court involving allegations of repudiatory breach of a fund subscription agreement amounting to USD 57 million and failure to respond to a capital call, resulting in a claim for USD 2.889 million in
contractual interest. The matter was significant due to its high-value and cross-border nature, involving complex legal issues relating to investor obligations, fund governance and the enforceability of capital commitments in private equity structures.The case underscored the critical
importance of understanding cross-border practices, particularly in the context of litigation involving international fund arrangements and multi-jurisdictional contractual obligations. (Singapore High Court Civil Suit No. HC/OC 400/2022)
Represented and acted for an Islamic factoring house in recovery litigation concerning outstanding facilities arising from Bai‘ Dayn Bi Al-Sila’ and Tawarruq-based transactions amounting to RM2million. The dispute involved challenges to the validity and enforceability of the facility
agreements and transactional documents, with legal arguments centred on compliance with Bank Negara Malaysia’s policy documents on Tawarruq and Bai‘ Dayn Bi Al-Sila’. The case required in-depth understanding of Islamic finance principles, including the structuring and operationalisation of Shariah-compliant receivables financing and raised key questions regarding contractual certainty, procedural adherence to Shariah governance and the enforceability of Islamic financing instruments in civil courts. This matter reflects our firm’s expertise in Islamic finance litigation, particularly in navigating disputes involving regulatory interpretations, contract structuring and financial recovery in the context of Shariah-compliant instruments. (Kuala Lumpur Civil Suit No.WA-22M-1012-06/2023)
Represented and acted for a prominent Malaysian businessman and three regional conglomerates in high-value civil proceedings involving the enforcement of both conventional and Islamic financing arrangements. The dispute, valued at approximately USD165.4 million, spans across
Malaysia, Singapore and the Cayman Islands and centres on the validity and enforceability of financing facilities, as well as associated security instruments, including a memorandum of deposit of shares and a personal guarantee. (Kuala Lumpur Civil Suit No. WA-22M-70-03/2022)
Represented and acted for the Client, a customer for the recovery of an Islamic factoring facility valued at approximately RM6.4 million. We also acted for the Client in commencing a Mareva and proprietary injunction against the said defendant to ensure the preservation and maintaining the status quo of the assigned contract proceeds relating to the financed contracts/projects. (Case No.: WA-22M-1403-07/2025)
Represented and acted for the Client in commencing an intervener proceeding and opposing against a winding up petition filed by the creditor of the Client’s customer. The intervener and opposition proceeding was commenced under the Client’s capacity as a majority creditor of the said customer. (Case No.: BA-28NCC-289-04/20250)
Represented our client, an Islamic factoring house in an application for a Mareva injunction and a proprietary injunction before the Kuala Lumpur High Court (Muamalat). The matter concerned a recovery process involving outstanding amounts arising from Islamic factoring financing. The injunctions sought were aimed at preserving the integrity and status of the assigned contract proceeds connected to the financing arrangement. (Case Number : NO. WA-22M-1403-07/2025)

Advised and represented a complainant, the former in-law of a medical practitioner, in disciplinary proceedings before the Malaysian Medical Council. The complaint followed the practitioner’s conviction and custodial sentence for outrage of modesty under Section 354 of the Penal Code. Despite the conviction, the practitioner was allowed to continue practising medicine, raising serious concerns about regulatory oversight and patient safety. Our representation was instrumental in bringing accountability within the professional regulatory framework, highlighting our firm’s commitment to advocating for victims, ensuring institutional integrity and navigating sensitive intersections between criminal convictions and professional disciplinary action. (Malaysian Medical Council Ref. No.: (12) dlm MPM 37755(S) – A)

Represented and acted for the plaintiff in a high-value commercial dispute involving claims amounting to approximately RM20 million for unpaid remuneration, business reimbursements, personal guarantees and non-gratuitous expenditures, raising novel issues on fiduciary duties,
shadow directorships and the enforceability of informal corporate promises. Central to the claim is extensive documentary evidence and the tracing of funds and assets across personal and corporate accounts. Reliefs sought include declaratory orders, specific performance for the
transfer of high-value assets, recovery of various payments and substantial damages among others for mental distress.This case is significant due to its scale, legal complexity and the blurred lines between personal and corporate dealings. It highlights the need for clarity in informal
business arrangements and may shape future treatment of fiduciary-like relationships beyond formal roles. (Shah Alam High Court Suit No. BA-22NCvC-179-05/2025)
Represented and acted for the 1st and 2nd Defendants in a shareholder dispute involving allegations of oppression, breach of fiduciary duty and breach of a shareholders’ agreement. The matter raised complex legal issues under the Companies Act 2016, including disputes over
majority shareholder rights, enforcement of contractual obligations through specific performance and control over corporate governance mechanisms. The value of the disputed shareholding was approximately RM500,000 and the case involved contested board decisions, strategic interference with management rights and claims for equitable relief. This matter reflects our firm’s expertise in resolving high-conflict shareholder and boardroom disputes, as well as navigating the intersection between statutory company law and private shareholder arrangements. (Kuala Lumpur Originating Summon No. WA-24NCC-230-05/2024)
Represented the Defendant in a shareholder dispute involving allegations of oppressive conduct concerning Srikandi Ayla Sdn. Bhd. The Plaintiff sought an order to compel the valuation and potential purchase of 150,000 shares held by our Client, relying on claims of oppressive conduct. The application also sought ancillary orders involving the Companies Commission of Malaysia (SSM) and solicitor–Client costs. Plaintiff commenced this OS, alleging in the supporting affidavit that the Defendant’s actions specifically, the intent to wind up the Company constituted oppression. After hearing the parties, the High Court dismissed the Plaintiff’s Originating Summons. Winning this case is highly significant for our client as it confirms that her conduct as a shareholder and director was not oppressive, allowing her to retain full control and ownership of her 150,000 shares. (Case No.: BA-24NCC-122-10/2024)
Represented the Petitioner in a winding-up petition involving a dental healthcare company operated through a company structured as a quasi-partnership. The petition was brought on just and equitable grounds arising from a complete breakdown of the relationship between the shareholders and serious concerns regarding the management of the Company and Clinic. The case centred on several key issues, including: the irretrievable breakdown of the quasi-partnership and the Second Respondent’s conduct in prioritising personal and family interests over the interests of the Company’s members as a whole; and the lack of professionalism and proper operational standards expected of a dental service provider. Our work includes advising, drafting and finalising the cause papers regarding the winding-up petition for Client. After considering the evidence and submissions, the High Court allowed the Petition to wind up the Company on just and equitable grounds. The learned judge further awarded costs of RM10,000.00 in favour of our client and appointed the Official Receiver as the liquidator of the Company. (Case No.: BA-28NCC-746-11/2024)

Represented and acted for the plaintiff, a surveying company, in a civil action involving the unauthorised withdrawal of RM1.24 million from a joint account in breach of a contractual agreement, including an urgent Mareva injunction application and multiple hearings, culminating in a successful amicable settlement. (Kuala Lumpur High Court Suit No. WA-24C(ARB)-10-03/2025)

Acted for a major utility company in Malaysia in debt recovery proceedings valued at a cumulative amount of approximately RM250,000.00. Our scope of work includes issuance of letters of demand on a regular basis, initiation of civil proceedings, securing of judgments and execution of
enforcement actions. The portfolio comprised both uncontested and disputed claims, with multiple successful outcomes achieved in favour of the client. This work has directly supported the client’s credit recovery efforts and contributed to the enhancement of their internal credit control processes and receivables management across various regions in Malaysia.
Acted for a reputable logistics company in Malaysia in debt recovery matters valued at a cumulative amount of approximately RM100,000.00. Our scope of work includes issuance of letters of demand on a regular basis, initiation of civil proceedings, securing of judgments and execution of enforcement actions. The portfolio comprised both uncontested and disputed claims, with multiple successful outcomes achieved in favour of the client. This work has directly supported the client’s credit recovery efforts and contributed to the enhancement of their internal credit control processes and receivables management across various regions in Malaysia.

Represented approximately 60 purchasers of residential properties in Kajang in a class action suit against a property developer for breaches of Sale and Purchase Agreements under the Housing Development (Control and Licensing) Act 1966 (HDA 1966). The claims involved structural defects, misrepresentation and unlawful use of common property, raising serious issues concerning construction standards, developer obligations and statutory protections for homebuyers. The matter required strategic management of multi-forum litigation, coordination among numerous plaintiffs and legal advocacy on issues of timeline compliance and building integrity. We also led the settlement negotiations, which concluded in a favourable resolution for the purchasers.This case is notable for helping to set a potential precedent in Malaysian housing law regarding collective redress and strengthening developer accountability under the HDA 1966, affirming our firm’s capabilities in consumer protection litigation and high-volume strata-related disputes. (Kuala Lumpur High Court No. WA-22NCvC-119-02/2024)
Acted for the estate administrator of a deceased Defendant in an ongoing land dispute valued at approximately RM1.6 million before the Kuala Lumpur High Court. The case involves allegations of fraudulent transfer of property, with central issues relating to identity misrepresentation, procedural irregularities and the application of the principle of indefeasibility of title under the National Land Code 1965. The matter presents intricate factual and legal challenges, including disputed documentation, estate liability and protection of registered title and is currently at the
trial stage. Our role underscores the firm’s capability in defending complex real property claims, particularly those involving fraud, estates and statutory land protections. (Kuala Lumpur High Court No. WA-22NCvC-445-06/2021)
Represented and acted for approximately 20 residential property purchasers in Kajang in a collective action against a developer for late delivery of vacant possession. The purchasers sought liquidated ascertained damages (LAD) totalling RM551,607.67, arising from the developer’s delay
in handing over the units. The matter involved complex legal issues relating to the interpretation and applicability of the Temporary Measures for Reducing the Impact of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) Act 2020 and broader principles of force majeure in the context of housing
development laws. We successfully negotiated a favourable settlement on behalf of the purchasers, avoiding protracted litigation and securing just compensation. This case demonstrates our firm’s capability in handling large-scale strata and housing disputes, consumer protection in property transactions and strategic settlement negotiations. (Kuala Lumpur Sessions Court No. WA-B52NCvC-568-12/2023)

Advised and represented numerous beneficiaries (Muslims & Non-Muslims) in complex probate and estate administration matters, including both testate and intestate estates. Our work involved navigating multi-party disputes, verifying entitlement, resolving competing claims among next-of-
kin and addressing cross-border elements involving foreign-held assets and non-resident beneficiaries. We routinely assist clients in securing grants of probate or letters of administration, negotiating family arrangements and protecting beneficiaries’ rights against mismanagement or
delay by executors and administrators.This experience underscores our firm’s sensitivity in handling emotionally charged family matters while delivering efficient and legally sound outcomes across a wide range of estate scenarios.

Represented and acted for the employer, an engineering company, in an Industrial Court dispute involving an unfair dismissal claim amounting to RM110,000 by a former Senior Quality Controller Engineer. The employee contested his termination on the grounds of redundancy, alleging
victimisation and unfair labour practice. We advised our client on all aspects of its defence, including the legal justification for the redundancy, the differentiation between the terminated role and a newly created position and the procedural fairness of the termination process. (Industrial Court Case No. 6/4-1427/24)
Represented and acted for a prominent electrical appliance manufacturer in Malaysia in a civil claim valued at approximately RM120,000 against a former Senior Sales Manager for serious breaches of fiduciary and contractual duties. The case involves allegations that the former
employee operated a competing business while still in employment, misused confidential company information and solicited clients and employees in contravention of his employment terms and non-disclosure obligations.The matter required swift and decisive legal action to safeguard the Plaintiff’s commercial interests, assert contractual rights and seek remedies including damages and injunctive relief. This case underscores our firm’s capability in handling employee misconduct, business protection litigation and enforcement of post-employment restraints with precision and commercial awareness. (Klang Sessions Court Civil Suit No. BL-A52NCVC-124-12/2024)
Represented our Client , in opposing claims filed by two former employees before the Industrial Court. The claims related to alleged unlawful salary deductions, unused annual leave and miscellaneous allowances under their service contracts. By presenting detailed written submissions and relying on documentary evidence, we demonstrated that all deductions were lawful statutory obligations, the employees were not entitled to payment for unused leave and miscellaneous allowances were claim-based and unsubstantiated. The Industrial Court dismissed the Complainants’ claims in their entirety. (Kes Saman Ketua Pengarah Tenaga Kerja No: KBR11004/2025/0420)
Represented a client in defending an unfair dismissal claim brought by a former lecturer, who alleged procedural impropriety, breach of natural justice and wrongful suspension pending investigation. We were tasked with drafting a through a detailed response to the Statement of Case and careful presentation of the employer’s investigation findings and domestic inquiry records. This case went to mediation and during mediation, we successfully negotiated a favourable settlement in which the Company made a modest ex-gratia payment without any admission of liability and secured a full and final closure of all employment-related claims. (Industrial Court Case No: 6/4-93/25)

Represented and acted for an individual in an appeal against the Sessions Court’s dismissal of a defamation claim concerning the inaccurate and defamatory entry of RM128,000 worth of credit information into the plaintiff’s CCRIS and CTOS credit reports. The Plaintiff via this case sought various reliefs, including mandatory and prohibitory injunctive orders to compel the removal of the impugned credit information from the CTOS credit report and other credit reporting platforms such as CCRIS and Bank Negara Malaysia’s database, as well as general, aggravated and exemplary damages. The matter was significant as it raised important issues concerning the duty of care imposed on credit reporting agencies and financial institutions in ensuring the accuracy and veracity of published credit data. It also highlighted the reputational and financial harm that may arise from the wrongful classification of individuals in credit reports, especially where such information is accessible to third parties and financial institutions. (Kuala Lumpur High Court Appeal No. WA-12BNCvC-78-05/2023)
Represented and acted for an Islamice factoring company in a RM625,000 claim against a former employee involving secret commissions, breach of fiduciary duties and conspiracy linked to the unlawful receipt of undisclosed payments. This case underscores the importance of transparency and fiduciary responsibility in financial services and involves complex legal and factual issues relating to corporate fraud and internal controls. The matter, which has far-reaching implications for the client’s governance and risk management policies, is currently pending trial. (Kuala Lumpur Sessions Court No. WA-B52NCVC-342-08/2024)
Represented and acted for an Islamic factoring company and its CEO in a high-stakes defamation suit against a former employee following his dismissal for breach of trust and internal misconduct. The former employee, after being served with multiple show-cause letters and ultimately
terminated, issued defamatory statements via email targeting the company and its CEO. These statements, disseminated to various internal stakeholders, included serious and false allegations of unethical practices, suppression of information, mismanagement and professional misconduct. Our team explored and pursued a range of legal remedies including claims for general, aggravated and exemplary damages, a public apology and injunctive relief to prevent further reputational harm. The matter demonstrated our firm’s capacity to respond swiftly to reputational threats, navigate the intersection of employment law and defamation and protect corporate leadership and brand integrity in regulated financial sectors. (Kuala Lumpur Sessions Court No. WA-B53CY-39-12/2024)
Represented and acted for a major telecommunication service provider in a RM3 million claim for occupation charges arising from trespass and refusal to vacate multiple telecommunications tower sites. The case centres on the complex issue of locus standi, specifically whether a tenant may assert rights to possession against another existing tenant, in circumstances where the landlord had issued an offer of tenancy to the claimant. The dispute involved overlapping tenancies, site control and the enforcement of commercial property rights within the telecommunications infrastructure sector. Our role included formulating a strategy to assert proprietary and contractual claims while addressing nuanced issues of possession, tenancy hierarchy and statutory duties under the Communications and Multimedia Act. This case demonstrates our firm’s strength in high-value commercial property disputes, particularly within regulated and infrastructure-heavy sectors and our ability to navigate multi-party site control conflicts with strategic precision. (Kuala Lumpur High Court Suit No. WA-22NCvC-395-07/2023)

Advised and represented a petitioning wife in family court proceedings involving a contested unilateral divorce petition, claims for matrimonial assets and custody of a minor child. The matter involved claims for an equal division of jointly acquired matrimonial properties and a detailed
parenting arrangement to secure custody, care and control of the parties’ young daughter. We provided strategic guidance on issues of spousal contribution (both financial and non-financial), child welfare and post-divorce support, ensuring that our client’s rights and the child’s best
interests were robustly protected. This engagement reflects our firm’s strength in navigating high-conflict matrimonial disputes with discretion, compassion and effective advocacy.

Key Contacts

Azrul Haziq

Senior Associate & Trademark Agent

azrul@nzchambers.com

Amira Khairul Anuar

Senior Associate

Alina Filza

Senior Associate

alina@nzchambers.com

Related Work Highlights

Work Highlights
Successful Defence in Labor Court Claims by Former Employees

Our Dispute Resolution practice group, led by Hoong Min Cheah and assisted by Najihan Kamarolzaman successfully represented our client in…

Read more ➜

Work Highlights
Successful Representation in Mareva and Proprietary Injunction Application.

Our Dispute Resolution practice group, led by Hoong Min Cheah and Senior Associate Azrul Haziq Khirullah successfully represented our client,…

Read more ➜

Financial Services

Advisory & Compliance

Mergers & Acquisitions

Projects & Infrastructure